We built CodeVerdict because reviewing take-homes was broken.
Reviews took hours. Reviewers cut corners under time pressure. AI-written submissions slipped through. Hiring became gut feel.
Make the take-home the fastest and fairest part of the interview.
Not the slowest. Every candidate, same depth of review. Every requirement, mapped to evidence in the code. Every report tells you what to ask in the follow-up.
Hiring teams should be spending their time talking to candidates, not grepping their code at 11pm.
What we believe.
Evidence over impressions
Every requirement is linked to an actual file, function, or test — not a reviewer's mood.
AI honesty, not gatekeeping
We surface AI-written code as a signal, not a verdict. You decide if it's a dealbreaker.
60 seconds, not 60 minutes
Reviews fit between meetings. Anything longer and reviewers cut corners.
Built by engineers who've done both sides.
We've written take-homes as candidates and reviewed them as hiring managers. We've felt every sharp edge — the late-night reviews, the "did they really write this?" moments, the "we already lost this candidate" moments.
Shipping in the open. [email protected]
See it for yourself.
One sign-in. One GitHub URL. One full report in 60 seconds.